The Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”) now includes 12 separate, but often inter-
related, programs involving Government and private funds of up to almost $3 trillion
— roughly the equivalent of last year’s entire Federal budget. From programs involv-
ing large capital infusions into hundreds of banks and other financial institutions, to
a mortgage modification program designed to modify millions of mortgages, to public-
private partnerships purchasing “toxic” assets from banks using tremendous leverage
provided by Government loans or guarantees, TARP has evolved into a program of
unprecedented scope, scale, and complexity.
Any effort this immense, "unprecedented" in peacetime, including the Great Depression, will only be done for a truly major catastrophe, not just a "recession". Paul Volcker, who is still at least nominally allied with the Administration, uses the euphemism "Great Recession" to describe the current downturn. Since the word "recession" was introduced solely for PR reasons and means what "depression" meant before the Great D, we must interpret his use of the term for what it is. TARP is response to an economic depression.
Re the looting charge, SIGTARP has already initiated almost 20 preliminary or full criminal investigations. These may be non-trivial:
. . . the cases include large corporate and securities fraud matters . . . insider trading, public corruption . . .
In addition, six areas of audit are underway. These include special mention of BofA and BofA/Merrill; all 9 initial TARP funds recipients; and the payments to AIG's counterparties.
SIGTARP is specially critical of Treasury's refusal to monitor what has happened to the funds given to large financial institutions in return for preferred stock. On its own, SIGTARP looked into the matter and received significantly detailed responses as to what the companies had done with the funds, sometimes in "granular" detail. Why has Treasury refused such a simple matter?
SIGTARP has numerous complaints about the PPIP, which will be thoroughly analyzed by other bloggers much more expert than I.
There will be multiple "bottom lines" in this mess. It is clear that at best Chairman Bernanke incompetently misdiagnosed matters as rosier than they were. I wonder if Big Hank Paulson also misdiagnosed things. In my humble opinion, he knew exactly how bad things were, given that he had recently run Goldman Sachs, which more or less runs Wall Street. He exposed himself by waiting for the crisis that he knew was coming after he put Fannie and Freddie into receivership, then making sure in a 2 1/2 page document to request immunity for any misdeeds he might be accused of doing in implementing TARP. How well is he sleeping these days?
We have had unprecedented stock market manipulation by the SEC, twice putting short squeezes on to harm those who (correctly) were shorting financial stocks, then taking the pressure off after insiders and favored institutions were allowed to unload a lot of stock at unfairly high prices.
We have a Democratic Congress that would not even investigate a Republican President for alleged contractor abuses in Iraq. One has to worry about how much zeal it will have to investigate a Democratic President's Treasury Department, especially when the Treasury Sec'y has been the glue in this disaster all along.
What is going on has elements of the Great Crash, in its financial and economic dimensions; and Watergate, with its political dimensions; as well as the S&L fiasco writ large. One cannot think of anything like this festering toxic mix within the past hundred or more years in this country. In this situation, where Big Finance and Big Government have been lying both by commission and by omission, there is no way to use historical economic tools to predict the future. We just do not know what we may not know, other than that as a pretty young bride said to Rick in Casablanca, the devil has the people by the throat.
Copyright (C) Long Lake LLC 2009