Credit Writedowns is running a piece without comment titled GDP 2.7% Higher if R&D Treated As Investment. Here is the beginning:
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) would have been, on average, 2.7 percent, or $301.5 billion higher between 1998 and 2007 if research and development (R&D) spending was treated as investment in the U.S. national income and product accounts, the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) announced today. The 2010 R&D Satellite Account updates and extends BEA’s estimates of the effect of R&D on economic growth through 2007, and now includes coverage of the most recent business cycle expansion.
This does not make sense to me. R&D is nothing but an expense unless or until it leads to a saleable product, and ideally a profitable product. It is bad enough that production of junk food and drink is given weight in GDP, but leisure time is given no weight. BEA must be desperate.
Copyright (C) Long Lake LLC 2010